We've been talking about ethics a lot lately. What makes something ethical? How do you decide? I've mostly offered a Kantian set of criteria, when asked for my opinion.
We've also been watching a lot of Nickelodeon.
Noor noticed, with the newest Burger King SpongeBob giveaway (Patrick's pants change color when they get wet!!!!), that there are a lot of SpongeBob endorsed food products.
Last night, on the way home from a friend's house, Noor asked if we could have a SpongeBob shopping day. I asked a few questions and she clarified that she wanted to see if it is possible to eat a full day's worth of food with only SpongeBob products to choose from.
This won't be the first time our food stamps helped pay for an experiment. We talked about that too: the nature of food stamps, where the funds come from, who gets them, how they're used.
Back to ethics. We looked online for a list of all the available SB endorsed food products on the market. We couldn't find one, but we did find this article from 2007, from which I read this snippet to Noor:
“Nickelodeon will be adopting a policy in which the use of licensed characters on food packaging will be limited to products that meet ‘better for you’ criteria, as established by marketing partners in association with government dietary guidelines,” she said.
Nickelodeon licenses its characters to Kellogg and General Mills, among other companies.
Ms. Zarghami said the only exception is for special-occasion foods such as birthday cakes, which kids aren’t likely to eat all the time. Disney has a similar exception.
A Nickelodeon spokesman said the changes are the result of talks with health and government groups.
The above policy was to be enacted in 2009. As we're in the early days of 2011, Noor reckons that Nickelodeon must believe that Burger King is a 'better for you' product.
Her next question was: "Better for you than what? Dog poop? What does that mean?"
I said I think it means foods that don't have a lot of sugar or fat, probably.
B--"If given a choice, would someone who likes SB choose chose plain packaging or something with the sponge?"
B--What if the SB product had more sugar, fat, chemicals than other foods?
N--Then they're tricking the kids.
Which brought us back to ethics, again.
We decided to go shopping and see what SB had to offer. Noor chose Target over another grocery story because she said they were a more SB kind of store.
Noor passed on the SB cookies
And on the chicken soup
We found seven food products and bought five. We observed that some SB foods were about 10 cents more than the same food without a SB theme. Noor also noted that for every SB product, you could choose the same thing, without SB packaging. "It is how they get kids to want that thing," she said.
When we got home, we talked about the foods we'd found and how content Noor would be to eat only these foods all day long, without anything else to choose from. So, "Could a kid live on SB food and nothing else?" Probably. Would they be satisfied? Healthy? That's a lot harder to answer!
We also talked about different theories about what makes a "balanced diet" and Noor categorized the SB foods according to their food group
SInce Noor loves pie charts, we chose this pie chart for the purpose of our experiment
And then we plotted the SB foods on a graph
Conclusion: Noor doesn't think she'd be happy on a SB-only diet for too long. She commented that Target didn't carry any fresh fruits or vegetables with SB and we'll probably check out a few other stores to see if there are more choices.
Is using SB to sell food to kids ethical? No, Noor says. If you just ate dairy, grains and sugar all day, your body wouldn't be healthy.
But what if companies used SB to get kids to also eat fruit and vegetables?
That's good, Noor says, but making kids want something because of a cute Sponge is "almost not really ethical."